Axioms should be stated in order to start thinking mathematically.

Axioms
1. sub-atomic particles exist that are uniform in structure with all other sub-atomic particles (hey... you gotta start somewhere)
2. particles at this sub-atomic level have a variable amount of spin allowing them to interact with and only with all other sub-atomic particles
1. This interaction of particles implies a time vector relative to each interaction of such particles
2. This interaction allows for structure to be created from particles
3. This excludes interactions between the structure as a whole interacting with a single particle... an electron interacts with other atomic level structures, not with particles. You don't think of throwing a ball as throwing the atoms of the ball. This is not to say the two aren't connected but the connection between atomic and sub-atomic levels will be better understood if we ignore the rules governing the atomic level structures.(and concentrate on the sub-atomic level)

August 27th, 2002
     I've decided on an approach. The force that brings particles together could be either attractive or repulsive. Obviously the attractive force would bring particles together, but this would not account for differing structures(and is somewhat counter-intuitive when thinking about spinning objects.) The repulsive force pushes particles apart, so when enough particles are repulsing, some particles are bound to come together by means of being pushed together by surrounding particles. This too leaves me scratching my head wondering what keeps them stable enough to last for any amount of time as actual structures. The combination of repulsiveness due to spin and an ambient attractive nature of particles seems to be the direction I'm heading.
     Spinning particles would attract along their axis of spin, while they would have a repulsing vector perpendicular to their axis.

     This may appear to be similar to magnetic attraction, but again, we're not discussing interactions of that level. These interactions are free from those types of rules. There is no north or south pole here, only an absence of repulsiveness at the poles.

February 13th, 2005
     Years have gone by without too much reflection on this page, however... recent scientific work has come to my attention that supports some of the underlying ideas. Major sources of reinvigorating my brain has been zero-point energy and the evolution of string theory to the point of some agreeing with my idea of how mass might be created... although string theorists would say that the vibration of the strings is what does the trick I would say that its the same principle... it really only depends on the topology that exists between the different dimensions as they interact to give either the string its vibration or the smallest particle its spin. For the record I could go either way without apprehension.
     And now to push forward I would say that the concept that brought me to this page was that a string's vibration would be determined by interactions between ten dimensions(ten being the number that is determined through mathematical equations which appears to be accepted.) This concept lead me to start thinking about what type of topology would exist in a ten dimensional world. One dimension gives us a point on a line, two-D would give the plane with still a point at an intersection. Three-D would give us our sphere and other shapes with which we are overly familiar yet still the intersection of any of the three axis'(plural for axis?) gives us our friendly point. Add time and things get a bit sketchy in the mind but are still manageable and again the trusty point of intersection is still just a point. This kind of leads me to think that there rests a point at the intersection of these ten dimensions. What this point is doing is really the question... is it pulsing with some form of energy or perhaps passing energy from one dimension to the next and thus affecting our apparent reality. And what of this string in string theory? Is it merely a wave of energy vibrating from the pressure from all dimensions? Is it a string of points that have similar energy signatures to create a string like wave of energy? Does a string interact with itself?
The questions have been asked... will there be another entry on this page? I'll let my brain mull it over a bit(I'll try not to interfere with it too much as it seems to do better when I stop thinking) and try to get back.

February 17th, 2005
     An intersection of the dimensions would be a point. At this point each dimension would exert some force such as field energy, or as they say "zero point energy" upon this point. This force would pass through the point and interact with other forces from different dimensions. the result would be a swirl affect at this point where this field energy or force would create a vortex at this point much like an ore moving thru water might create. So instead of talking about a particle lets change it into a point. The outer shell of the particle in the picture would become the vortex with similar axis and attractive and repellant properties.
     It may serve us well to talk about the landscape of such points as they might exist. I envision that these intersections would appear much like a quilt is sewn to attach differing layers of fabric. So these points can be moved closer or or stretched further apart without disturbing their integrity. The difference would be that unlike a quilt the different layers, dimensions, would be very different with regards to physics... distances would be different and other things like that. (This would lead to the apparent spooky action at a distance phenomenon.) So these points would allow for the passage of force from dimension to dimension and thus for the creation of vibrating strings in string theory if say some of these points were to gather at a location and become a stable structure... stable enough not to be torn apart by outside forces. Remember that nothing would appear at a single point... only if these points are pushed together or are attracted together would they form these string like structures. Once in the form of strings then you can add the vibrations and your string theorist can have at it. I'll come up with a couple of pictures in a few days... I don't have time right now....

February 26th, 2005
     I seem to be building steam (in my mind anyways.) I'm going to slightly change some things above for the sake of keeping it all relative... like when I wrote that force would move from dimension to dimension its not to be taken that actual energy is moved around in a one-to-one relationship but that these zero-point intersections would have the properties such that their field strength would change as they were stretched or moved closer together. Again I would say that we need to reemphasis the importance of not mixing our atoms with our quarks or strings as different rules apply for each level of construction. Orientation would also have differing effects just as vortexes effect each other when in close proximity.
     Now, how things are actually built depend on what dimension your talking about... in our friendly 3-d these zero-points come together to form these string like features that tend to appear to vibrate as these vortices tremble in their own wakes attracted to one another by their axis and repelling at their spin. The stuff that is in between these points is just space... points where there is no intersection between dimensions and thus are available to interact solely in their own dimension with the rules set down in that particular dimensions geometry. So a distance between two particular zero-points would be different in each dimension's space according to each dimensions own geometry, yet the points field effect on each other might just remain the same depending on what changes occur in other dimensions. This would give rise to spooky action at a distance in a very nice little package. Because the field strength of the points that make up the quantum structure that exhibits the property of this phenomenon would appear in our world to show that regardless of distance in our dimension the particles seem to be connected in that what you do to one will effect both particles at the same time even if one is far far away.... but really in another dimension the same group of zero-points are very close together so much so that their field strength affects each other which makes them interact simultaneously.
Analogy:
Take two walkie-talkies, I have one and you take the other. Now if we stand close I can talk into mine and you will here my voice in yours.. the message will take enough time for the radio wave to reach your receiver. If we move farther apart my voice will take longer to reach you because it has to traverse a longer distance. Now lets say instead of radio waves we use a set of walkie-talkies that use quantum pairs to transmit the message. Now we can move far apart in our 3-d world but our quantum pair of walkie talkies are connected through their zero-point connection that no matter how far we stretch the space in our own dimension the space between the points in some other dimension remains close enough for the two zero-points to interact giving us the ability to instantaneously communicate. This interaction in the other dimension affects the field strength of the zero-points perhaps in a different way that they are affected in our dimension but with the right quantum pairs of particles (which are perhaps a very complex structure of zero-points) we can observe the changes in the receiving particle and with the right equations can predict what the proper translation of that reception would be. This may be difficult now because of the uncertainty principle, but our uncertainty is most likely a result of not seeing the actual structure of the particles and not knowing the actual process of interaction between them. We will solve this in time. This may seem rough.. its very clear in my head but the ability to put it down on paper(or screen) is a bit evasive. I'll think of better ways to describe it.. maybe a more complete view is in order... To correct my axioms from above I would write:

Axioms (revised)
1. Zero-points exist at intersections of dimensions (hey... you gotta start somewhere)
2. Zero-points have a vortex of field energy exerting a certain amount of force allowing them to interact with other zero-points
1. This interaction allows for structures to be created from zero-point vortex force
2. This excludes interactions between the structure as a whole interacting with a single zero-point... an electron interacts with other atomic level structures, not with zero-points. You don't think of throwing a ball as throwing the atoms of the ball. This is not to say the two aren't connected but the connection between atomic and sub-atomic levels will be better understood if we ignore the rules governing the atomic level structures.(and concentrate on the sub-atomic level)
3. Zero-points have space between them which differs with each dimension's geometry.

March 1st, 2005
     Ok.. Here is a crude sequence of how a vortex might form in a simple 2-dimensional rendering. The principle would be the same for any number of dimensions. We start with some points of intersection between the dimensions. Then we move the points; in this case the top two move to the right. The points have a field that effects each other, in that, as the points move across each other a swirling affect starts to happen to the point's field as seen.

     This might not look like much of a vortex. And in our 3-d space this type of zero-point vortex might not be created from just the motion/bending of our own space, but remember that ALL points are interacting with each other and are intersections of the unfamiliar dimensions as well. Imagine an intersection point where a dimension's force was constantly moving across. This would have a constant swirling affect. Does a dimension do this?... take some TIME and think about this one... hehe. Even time would create this affect as it moved steadily thru our 3-d world.

     In this case the points of intersection actually pass over each other, not thru a bending of space but because zero-point force is being exerted from the time dimension onto the intersection point which gives us this vortex. And in the "special case" of the time dimension this zero-point force is continuous.

     Possible emerging rules:

1. Each dimension has its own set of rules governing how the fields of zero-point force interact with-in that dimension.
2. Force exerted from one zero-point to the next can differ in relation to distance depending on each dimension's geometry.
3. Zero-point force can be transferred from one point to another.(maybe.. maybe not.. not sure I like this one...)

March 6th, 2005
     So now we have dimensional intersection points that exert a force upon one another depending on the strength and orientation of the field vortex at the given intersections. Cool... Now what? I could start looking at how these particular zero-points would go about creating any kind of structure... say like a vibrating string that string theorists always talk about. In order for any structure to remain a structure there must be a certain amount of stability in the energy levels of the vortexes. I am leaning towards calling the time dimension a special case dimension because I feel that it is the thing that maintains stability by its constant motion/force exertion. Time might not be a single dimension although if it were more than one, that would muddle things even more for the minds eye. I'll discuss it as if it were just a single dimension and keep an open mind if I find out later that it needs to be more than that. crossing fingers To the question of the interaction between time and our space, I'll have to let the brain wander a bit for that one.
     As these zero-points move about they may accumulate thru attractive force which may be an ambient force that these intersections have or because of the vortex force at the axis which would tend to create a force-vacuum of sorts. The repulsive force would be perpendicular to the axis and depend solely on the strength of the vortex. Combining the attractive and repulsive forces would bring these points together in a string because you wouldn't be able to attach one to the side of a vortex... it just wouldn't stay there. The string like structure would seem to vibrate because of the variability of each of the vortices. As to how many points it would take to make a string, well that's simple.. 8. hehe actually I have no idea how many it would take.

March 8th, 2005
     As regards to the time dimension:
On the left, in blue, we have zero points in a space dimension. On the right, in red, we have these same points in the time dimension. Note the distance of the points in space versus the distance of the points in time. If the distance is closer in the time dimension then that time dimension will dominate how the zero-points will interact with one another.

     This is the reason that time tends to dominate our space. The same zero-points that we have in our space are actually positioned closer in time thus the motion of time dominates us. One of the ways to overcome time (at least mathematically) is in a black hole where the zero-points in our space get compacted so close that they become closer to how compact they are in time thus seemingly slowing time. Another affect is to travel close to the speed of light. This does something different to the energy level of zero points. As zero-points move thru our space the vortices are passing other zero-points that act upon the moving zp's in a way that gives their vortex greater strength. This greater strength may either pull zero-points in our space together or it may be that the increased strength of field force is enough to overcome the strength of how these zp's are interacting in the time dimension.
     I don't have time to finish my thought right now but I'll revisit this idea as I think it is important to fully understand.

March 9th, 2005
     Just to finish the thought... I would say that the amount of time passage that we notice in our 3-d space relies upon how strong a force the zero-points have on each-other(relativity) either thru being in close proximity in our space or thru vortex force caused by moving thru our space. This of course brings us to the case of proximity and naturally gravity pokes us in the ribs and says, "hey what about me?"
     Gravity dimension/dimensions? well sir... I'm thinkin hard about this one... and I'll go ahead and type whilst I allow my mind to wonder around it. Would gravity be a single dimension or would it mirror our 3-d world? Is it a dimension at all?.. or merely a function of our own space. If it were a function of our own space then I would let traditional physicists have their way with it so enough said... but if it was a dimension in and of itself than I would explore it further.. and so I will...
     Perhaps for starters I'll think of gravity as a single dimension, not unlike time but certainly having different geometric spatial rules. Time appears to be very compact in that the zero-points are very close together. The question would be; what type of spatial geometry does gravity have? Now I know you draw a representation of gravity with a grid and a ball with the ball bending the grid.. I've seen the pictures and understand the concept but that tells you little of what is actually going on. How does our space interact with gravity as a separate dimension(keep in mind that I'm assuming it is a separate dimension for the purpose of exploration.) Zero-points in gravity are either more dense or less dense than they are in our space(on average.) So to take the case of more dense; then as we gather zero-points in our space we could over-come gravity, but that is the opposite of what actually happens. As zero-points gather in our space, gravity becomes more dominant... hmmm I smell some contradictions coming up. As zero-points get closer in our space then we should be more free to move these zp's around without interference from other dimensions. But gravity acts inversely. So you can concoct some story about an inverse geometry in the gravity dimension or come back to your senses and look for an easier answer to the question...square one..(taking two steps back)
     Just for fun lets take the case of gravity being an affect of our own spatial geometry. As zero-points have a field in relation to all other zero-points(remember that zp's are just intersections of dimensions) and are ambiently attracted to one another thru this zero-point field, zp's naturally come together unless acted upon thru vortex force, which repels. So in order to overcome the gravity affect you need to increase the vortex of the zero-points. So I would say that the classical view of gravity being a bend in space-time is functionally correct, but actually inaccurate. The reason it appears to be correct is because time is the thing that is actually being affected by the closeness of zp's in our space. When you assume that space and time have the same dimensional rules then it appears to bend both space and time but separating space and time into different dimensions with different spatial architectures properly gives a different picture.
     So to recap what gravity is and how it affects us.. Zero-points have a field force between them that ambiently attracts them together. This affects zp's regardless of whether they happen to be bunched in strings (which make quarks which make atomic particles etc.) or are just wandering about all by themselves. The other force that works on the zp's is the vortex which repels perpendicular to its axis. Now some zp's have a greater vortex than others and thus repel more. These more repellant vortexes are caused by other zp's passing nearby thus increasing the spin of the vortex. Note that the spin is a multidimensional vortex and is not the same as a simple 3-d vortex that might cancel itself out if the two passing vortices had opposing spin. I feel that a zp's vortex acts more like an energy level that might not have opposing spin, but the vortex analogy is easier to describe than a multidimensional intersecting energy field. So gravity is simply the affect of the ambient attractive force between multidimensional intersections which can be over come by vortex force. hmmm.. so what causes inertia again? relativity in this ambient attraction? I imagine that both forces cause inertia; and mass is simply a measure of a structure's potential relative attraction to some other structure. Does that work for now?
     I'm going to the library for some research on actual gravity affects (rather than theory) to try and find anything that contradicts my theory and come back to the G issue later. Note that the only issue I can see with my model is that classical physics says nothing about how our space interacts with other dimensions or zero-points so its not surprising that I would step on some important toes here or there along the way. So I stand by every conclusion I make with the all important ability to change anything I've said as new information is brought to my attention. Of course once an entry is made I keep it posted as is so I can go back and see what was originally wrong and how I fixed it. What I will be looking for is gravity in our solar system, on our planet naturally and so called anti-gravity devices... even though I know AG devices aren't proven there certainly seems to be something going on... and if you want to be on the cutting edge you need to stick your neck out a bit and see as far as you can.

March 12th, 2005
     OK.. I've done some poking around and found a few things of note. I think perhaps I could allow for some sort of north/south pole of sorts for a zp field. However, the field spreads out into many dimensions and thus must have a much more complex pole. I would say that the structures that are created from zp's would have to be aligned properly in order for the vortex force to overcome its attractive force. This would mean that although the vortex force would be more prominent on an individual basis, the complexity of zp structure, like a string, would become more dominated by its ambient attractive force due to a cancelling affect of the surrounding zp's. Also we need to account for the varying strength of the zp's vortex as its field is changed in a vibrational manner. The vibrational manner is caused by the time dimension continually passing the zp's adding vortex energy which is then sapped by its interactions with other dimensions then hit again by the time dimension thus increasing its vortex back up causing a vibration in energy level. Several things can be played upon here. You can perhaps affect a structure's ambient attraction by impacting it with another structure(classical propulsion) or by applying energy to the structure so that the zp vortices of the structure align and exert its field force in a more predictable direction. And thus the vortex force would become controllable. The trick would be to do this without losing the integrity of the structure itself. It makes no sense to propel a car if you destroy the car in doing so. We come back to the vibration effect. I would guess that the structures are held together because of a maintained frequency of vibration. If you can add energy to a structure (thus moving zp's across one another in order to increase the vortex strength of the zp's) in a way that does not disrupt the natural frequency of vibration of the structure then you may be able to gain control of the structure's ambient attractiveness to other structures(gravitational affect.) Now you can do this without actually having direct control of direction because the structure would simply maintain its position within the multi-dimensional grid as our space kept moving along. So it would in fact appear to be released from gravitational effects. It still is affected by ambient attractiveness though. It merely doesn't react to it because it is being acted upon by a greater force (vortex repellant force.)
     Long story short.. I'm going to go ahead and add some sort of pole to a zp's field force. And acknowledge the importance of vibrational frequency as it pertains to any structures integrity. I will most certainly revisit the gravitation effect as I move through this thought experiment, but will now focus on the pole that will be added and look more closely at the vortex field of an individual zero-point.

March 17th, 2005
     This may take a while as I'm catching up on my electromagnetism and string theory..mostly need to polish my notation and clarify some foggy ideas about projecting a field into multidimensional space. As I work on the field itself I will still add some entries about crap that comes to light along the way.

March 30th, 2005
     THE HORIZON PROBLEM: Explanation that fits with this dimensional intersection theory.
A long standing problem is that cosmologically speaking, background radiation filling the cosmos is at the same temperature everywhere. If you look in opposite directions 14 billions light years out, the temp is the same... very uniform... yet nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, so there is no way that heat radiation could have traveled between the two spots which are 28 billion light years apart to even out the hot spots and cold spots (assuming as we do that the big bang happened 14 billion years ago.)
     Well if there is a dimension that is very compact it may be able to quickly transport the energy over the time period of our particular 'big bang' universe in order to cause the temp equilibrium that we see now. The mechanism for this energy to be able to move between our 3-d world and this other dimension may have only existed because of early imbalances caused by the big bang itself and as our universe became more balanced this mechanism either reached a critical point and ceased or simply has become undetectable. What's so problematic about that?

March 31st, 2005
     Another thought on the big bang... What if (I do a lot of what-if-ing) The big bang was the creation of our 3 space dimensions that happened through some mechanism of other dimensions. I remind myself often that the world is most certainly far stranger than we can imagine. Perhaps the multi-dimensional universe existed and some event that took place in some other set of dimensions (perhaps a relatively small event) caused our 3-d world to pop into existence... or our 3 dimensions existed but all the intersection points were compacted together in a way that caused a critical event and blew them apart... mind candy...

April 7th, 2005
     How is it that a photon can carry its energy all the way across the universe without having energy added to it?
I had mentioned earlier that time acted as a stabilizer because it constantly pushes against the other dimensions. Then perhaps its force upon the zps in a photon creates enough energy to keep it rolling. The other idea is that a photon has a high enough zp energy that its not quite as hindered by time (time dilation) thus it appears to be able to maintain its energy on the long journey. Either way looks ok to me. What about spontaneous mass creation? (per measurements that show an Earth growing faster than can be accounted for) As zp's collect in a region of our space, they can gather and start to build up as sub atomic structures. Once in their structure form they can go from there and create all kinds of good stuff... problem is that we don't actually notice this going on around us. Perhaps in order for zp's to actually form into strings and stuff they have to be properly tuned (resonance style). And perhaps this can take place in the planet core, or Sun's core or other really big objects cores where specific nuke reactions are taking place.

April 9th, 2005
     Changes being made
The more I look into the actual structure of a single dimensional intersection as I have set them up appears to be more and more problematic in that I have given them the ability to move. I will now take that ability away. This creates a static zero-point field. Now instead of actually physically moving, the zps will only have the ability to pass energy from one point to the next. The mechanism for doing so will most likely be through vibration. The vortex that would be created as energy is passed from one dimension into the others would be dependant upon the energy level being passed and the current energy pressure in each of the dimensions surrounding the point(a dimensions ability to absorb the passed energy.) We would be moving away from ambient attraction completely and focus more on energy pressure as the sole cause of energy passage. As for multi-dimensions outside our familiar 3-d space and the special case of time, I will keep those extra dimensions in mind as possibilities if the math requires, but will not discuss them as it appears not to be necessary.
     It's quite possible that the biggest change is only in my head because the axioms will remain unchanged. The March 1st motion pictures are bunk though because they depict bending of the grid and motion of a point past another. Any reference to such curved space or motion of zero-points should hereby be disregarded. The March 8th pictures are still in play as they show the differences in distance between the same zps as they exist in different dimensions. The time dimension still dominates because energy pressure is very high due to the closeness of the zps... only to be defeated in our 3-d space by conditions that create very high pressure in our space(like black holes and moving past the speed of light.)
     A structure, such as a photon, would no longer move by itself. In fact the zps that create the structure of a photon wouldn't move. They would however pass their energy to the next zp and thus the photon structure would have the appearance motion. This mechanism would give rise to other interesting notions. The speed at which an object can move through the grid of zps is dependant upon its ability to pass its energy along the grid without interference from the time dimension. You may say that a photon moves at the fastest speed possible, but this is certainly not so. There may appear to be a barrier because we have trouble measuring anything that travels faster than the speed of light. However, if it were completely unaffected by the time dimension then it would move across the entire zp grid instantaneously, and this is certainly not the case. So we have a possibility for other structures to break the so called speed of light barrier. And it appears that the affects of gravity can be measured to do this. One way to possibly measure the speed of gravity (at least locally as the speed of gravity might be variable) is to compare it to the speed of light. We can measure the light from the moon as it reaches its closest point in orbit around the Earth we can also measure the moons highest amount of gravity affect upon the earth. If the measure of gravity occurs before the measure of light(as I believe it does), than we can compare the time difference and measure the speed of gravity. I don't have the tools to do this myself, but I'm sure they exist. I would very much like to see the results of such an experiment.
     So what creates a structure? The force energy of the zps still create the smallest particles wether we're talking about strings or anything else, essentially everything is made from this field force energy. The change I'm really making is that instead of structures persisting in space they do not exist for more than a moment because of time. A particular set of zero-points that create an object is stressed by the time dimension to pass that energy to other zero-points, thus the only thing that is preserved is the actual zero-point field energy. This might seem impossible because you're sitting there and not moving... but actually you are in every sense of motion. Not only are you moving because of the rotation of the earth but the earth itself is moving around the sun... etc... But the important realization if you extend the thought of vibrational energy is that even if you were positioned in outer space free from all gravity and remaining as still as possible, the energy that you're made of is still vibrating and thus you remain in motion always. Even if it is merely a back and forth between the same zero-points it is still motion of energy. This also may seem very chaotic, but remember that the energy pressure that surrounds us and pressures us from the time dimension maintains our structure's stability. I have more to add, but my wrist is a bit sore from hitting the heavy bag a bit too hard today so I'll give it a rest but maintain the thought.

April 9th, 2005 (continued...)
     New gravity...
     Now that we're dealing with high pressure energy wanting to move to areas of low pressure energy we need to discuss the effects of gravity in a different way. At the sub-quantum level the field energy would 'want' to move to low pressure areas, but if a structure forms it is held in place by vibrational frequency and its ability to be absorbed into other directions is hampered. So I would come to the conclusion that it is because of the vibrational frequency that holds a structure together that actually causes the gravity effect. As you move more structures together they lose their ability to pass field energy and thus become energy absorbers. This can be defeated through means of disrupting the vibrational frequency of the structures. What might happen at a black hole might be that the there is such a stable vibration of possibly very high frequency that field energy absolutely can't be passed through it even to the point of tearing apart any other structure and absorbing its field energy. In the case of a quasar you may see some sort of toroidal shape structure that again is very stable with very high vibrational frequency that does not allow energy to pass through with its own vibrational frequency in tact.. it would destroy the structure, but instead of absorbing the field energy like a black hole it would regurgitate it at its poles. This mechanism would be due to its underlying toroidal structures very stable and over powering vibrational frequency.
     So we have a gravity the actually works like our observed gravity. Structures come together because of their inability to be pushed away from one another. The structure itself would be an absorber of field energy and would need some process of shedding this energy, which I will discuss later. The idea would be that energy moves to low pressure. Low pressure is an area in the grid that energy can easily be absorbed. Sub-quantum level field energy moves from one dimension (most cases from time) through the intersection zero-point and this energy has a choice... in 3-d space it moves in the direction of least resistance. In the case of a structure being formed of field energy, the choice that this passed energy has is the same. It still wants to go where it is 'wanted'. Again, a structure is created and held together through the means of vibrational frequencies. This vibration would hinder passed energy from being able to move through it. Although from the standpoint of its choice that it is making, other directions may appear to be higher pressure due to the absorbsion effect that the structure displays. This absorbsion effect is caused by a structures ability to hold its energy within the structure and thus field energy is not moving away from it. This is how low field pressure is created. Even though the gathering of energy within the structure is high-pressure, the field surrounding the structure is low. The higher pressure the structure, the lower pressure that exists around it. I honestly didn't see that coming.

April 11th, 2005
     Geometrically speaking we will need to address infinity.
My biggest concern is that if you look at something very small you will need to accept the fact that it is made of something which will need to be either smaller or not of this spatial dimension. The latter gets complicated fast and the understanding of such may not bear any discernible fruit. So to accept that the smallest thing we discuss is in fact made of smaller things we need to talk about operational limits. The idea of operational limits is that we take a finite measurable chunk of our 3-D space and decide that it has a finite amount of operational dimensional intersections. The finite amount of intersections that will pass energy will be the only intersections that have the capacity to operate in this fashion. Any other smaller entity will not be discussed because it should not make any discernible difference as to the measurable operation of the ether field. This will clear the way to talk about an infinite world with finite measurable terminology.
     Now we have a static ether field of dimensional intersections. We can discuss a finite amount of space as having a finite number of dimensional intersections. The three dimensions in our space appear to have a one-to-one relationship where as the time dimension has some other relationship with other dimensions yet to be mathematically defined. It can be said that I believe that the time dimension is more compact than the other three dimensions in that it appears to dominate our 3D space. I have also stated that the special case of the time dimension constantly exerts force upon the other three dimensions which is noticeable in the constant motion of structures in our 3D space.

April 27th, 2005
     Now we can look at our dimensional intersections as energy is passed from one to the next in a workable manner. The time dimension is the key to motion. It is not a one-to-one relationship with regards to our friendly three dimensional space. This simply means that the geometric spatial divide between zero-point intersections is different in the time dimension as compared to the three space dimensions. Taking into consideration the energy pressure dynamics between the intersections, I must conclude that the time dimension is highly pressurized, thus tightly packed spatially. Take the distance between two zero-points in 3-D space and measure it against the distance between the same two zero-points in time and you would find that the time dimension is far more reactive thus can be measured to be in closer proximity. High pressure energy naturally flows to lower pressure areas. Thus energy flows out of the time dimension giving motion to 3-D space.
     This energy flow creates a vortex of energy. However, the shape of the vortex is described by how it moves from one dimension into one other. Once this energy is in our space it can then move in a one-to-one relation with its surroundings when pushed by the time dimension. Conceptually speaking inertia does not exist at this simple level of energy. Only high pressure energy moving to low pressure being pushed by time. The vortex that comes from energy being passed from the time dimension into 3D space must 'move' towards the lowest pressure area. Thus it becomes unidirectional. It does not emanate equally into all directions like some explosion.. An energy unit can be more closely described as a vibration of the intersection point in the direction of the energy passage. This energy vortex then either dissipates as it 'passes' its energy to the next intersection point or is preserved depending on the surrounding energy pressures. If it is preserved then the vortex will 'spin' upon its axis in moments of stability until it can pass its energy to another zero-point. Upon energy passage the next zero-point vibrates with the same frequency as the first. This idea would suggest that the time dimension is variable in intensity thus allows for differences to propagate through the grid of zero-point intersections.
     To rid yourself of laws of physics and continuity of time is not easy to do, but this must be done to grasp the concepts of underlying principles. (an electron does not care about aerodynamics.)

May 18th, 2005
     I'm currently working on pushing this into the form of a readable paper. Turning incoherent thoughts into tangible linear ideology is quite a task. But for now I will discuss pressure dynamics with more detail. The scalability of pressure dynamics is really a driving force of my ideology. Pressure relationships can be seen everywhere you look. From water going down the toilet to electricity moving through wires. Interesting formations appear at all different levels of observation. Spiral galaxies are similar in appearance to hurricanes. Nebulas look like colored smoke while star clusters look like suspended bubbles in water(kind of.) My point is that all of these similar structures must have some similar driving force behind their creation.... I'll finish this thought later...but you can see where I'm going with it anyways so do I really need to finish?

September 7th, 2006
     A couple of things have sidetracked me a bit this past year, but I'm starting to settle in again. A coherent ending to the story is what I will need to push this to a paper so after a few starts and stops I will attempt to clarify a few things before re-attempting that challenge. (It may be that I just don't think well in an organized setting... better to allow my self to ramble and allow revelations to coalesce. Like the one from my commute home last night. I was driving and recording my ramblings and realized a method for the time dimension to cause spin. We start with our very small operational limited realm of dimensional intersections. We can say there is a field made of smaller messenger particles (which belong to a smaller operational group) that serve as a fluid dynamic field in which our larger structures are able to move with time. So the ability of each structure to move through the time dimension defines that structure's mass. As it is hindered through time it gains mass. Now we still have a field with messenger particles, which pass information from one structure to another dictating whether these structures are attracted or repulsed. So if structures are attracted then as they move through time together they might not be moving through time at the same rate. If structure A is moving faster through time than structure B then A will start spinning around B because its held by its attraction due to the fluid dynamics defined by the field. This gives spin to our structures. This idea moves directly to relativity. But also lends itself to my original idea of a vortex. As these energy structures (particles) are attracted by the field elements (which belong to a smaller class of operational limits) they move through time at a rate defined by their structures ability to do so and if they move at differing rates they can be said to have different mass and one begins to move faster through time and then begins to spin around each other causing the vortex to be created. This is the thrust of the notion. Now this was something that occurred to me, but I realize that it's probably not such a new idea. So I will take it for what it is and move on from here continuing with my loose ramblings, as that is the best way my mind travels.

September 25th, 2006
     It occurs to me that I have yet to discuss how energy is passed from dimension to dimension. All energy is wave in motion. The properties of the wave energy are dependent upon the particles the wave is propagating along. The motion is dictated by the amount of time that passes. The time that passes is regulated by its ability to pass through structures. Take for instance a very simple world starting with a field of arbitrarily small particles, which can combine into a stable structure that maintains its form through various means. Now we can take a closer look at how wave energy is passed through the time dimension. The wave of energy is passed from one moment to the next freely along the small particles where there is no structure to inhibit it. Where there is a structure, the wave is slowed thus causing a difference in how time moves in that space. And so we have a notion of relativity where time is variable in space.

October 22nd, 2007
     I can now take this idea into another direction. The use of another dimension seems to be the way to go from here. Instead of time being the 4th dimension, I will use gravity as that dimension. Time can still have its own dimension but it will have its own seperate topology. Gravity is not a force that acts upon particles rather it is a dimension in which objects moving through it at different speeds display different masses. So for instance we assume a 4-dimension space defined by the 3-axis space (x, y, z) and the gravity dimension g. So we take two objects that are linked by some force (i.e. magnetism, nuclear, even a pressure based relation) and are moving through the x dimension but not the y or z dimension. Then you set one to move through the g dimension at a slower rate than the other. Being linked through any force we can expect that in the space dimensions these objects would accelerate towards each other due to the link they have and not wanting to separate in 4-dimensional space. Mathematically you could start with one at 0,0,0,0 (x, y, z, g) and the other at 0,10,0,0. We can move them in the direction of x at the same rate of time and move them through g at different rates of time. You can step out the interaction maintaining the constant 4 dimensional separation and see that in the 3-dimensional space they appear to be accelerating towards each other.
     Say the connection between two objects is pressure based. We could start by saying that all dimensional points push on one another. If you introduce an object like an atom the structure of that object traps or locks the pushing force into the structure. This object then creates a low-pressure area (that appears to not be pushing) which other objects will observe less pressure from. This becomes their link through the gravity dimension. Right now I'm favoring time as the dimension that introduces this pushing energy into the system. Time being the most dense dimension would apply energy pressure into the other dimensions. At the locations where there is structure there is also a higher amount of energy which causes the time dimension energy to pass more slowly through it. The catch here is that even though there is a higher amount of energy pressure at each point in the structure, this pressure is locked into the 4 dimensional structure. The topology of the time dimenion does not see the structure, it only sees the points of intersection through which to pass its energy. Because of the topology of the 4-dimensional space the pressure from the time dimension is locked into the structure and is not pushing out into the surrounding space. Somewhat like having two drains in a tub of water. Now say there were short hoses attached to the drains. The ends of the hoses would be attracted to each other due to the lack of water pressure each one has.

October 22nd, 2007
     

More to come....